Why different

Peeld is built around the standard you need to prove, not a dashboard you need to interpret.

Compare

Typical eval stack

Peeld

Question

Is the model observable?

Can the team defend this behavior?

Unit of work

Trace, span, dataset, dashboard

Published module, run, failure, report

Customization

Usually prompt sets or library code

Domain, compliance, code, workflow, and private standards

Output

Scores and debugging signals

Evidence tied to prompts, targets, versions, and review status

The difference is the artifact.

Peeld treats every assessment as something a product, risk, compliance, or platform team may need to explain later. The report is not a screenshot of a score. It is the traceable record of what was tested and why it matters.